The Bar Council of India forbids advocates from advertising or soliciting in any shape or manner. By using this website (amicuspublico.com), you recognise and affirm that you are seeking information about AMICUS PUBLICO on your own initiative and that AMICUS PUBLICO or its members have made no solicitation, advertising, or enticement. This website's content is provided for educational purposes only and should not be construed as solicitation or advertisement. If a visitor wishes to obtain or use our legal services online or offline, it is performed on his or her own free will and agreement, and should not be regarded as solicitation, enticement, or advertisement in any way. AMICUS PUBLICO is not responsible for any actions made as a result of relying on the material/information on this website.
Suhani and Mishu Jain introduced Amicus Publico LLP and underscored the firm’s commitment to delivering comprehensive legal solutions.
Advocate Anuradha Upadhyay, a seasoned legal professional with extensive experience in corporate litigation, delivered an insightful overview of the MSMED Act. She meticulously detailed Sections 18 (2) and 18(3), emphasizing their significance in safeguarding MSME interests.
Following Advocate Upadhyay, Advocate Ganesh Sharma shared recent Supreme Court rulings on limitation periods and provided an overview of Sections 15 and 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006. Advocate Sharma’s expertise in various litigation domains, including banking and consumer disputes, enriched the session.
Sunita Sharma, General Secretary of Laghu Udyog Bharati, Jaipur Region, highlighted initiatives promoting self-reliance and women empowerment. Shilpi Purohit, Joint Commissioner of the Department of Industries and Commerce, underscored efforts in entrepreneurship awareness. Sanjay Meena, Assistant Director at the Ministry of MSME, discussed intellectual property rights’ role in supporting MSME growth.
Copyright 2024 Amicus Publico LLP, All Right Reserved
Automated page speed optimizations for fast site performance